top of page
Neal H. Roth
BARRISTER & SOLICITOR
Providing Superior, Realistic and Ethical Legal Services.
WITH 41 YEARS OF LEGAL EXPERIENCE IN TORONTO
Neal has developed a solid reputation for being superbly effective and efficient in meeting the legal requirements of his clients. He offers excellent services at competitive rates, while always maintaining and promoting the best interests of his clients.
.png)
.png)
.png)
Neal offers all clients a personable experience with a clear
understanding of their needs every step of the way.
AREAS OF PRACTICE
CIVIL LITIGATION
CORPORATE LAW SERVICE
REAL ESTATE LAW
CONSTRUCTION LIEN LITIGATION
ESTATE LAW
SIGNIFICANT LANDMARK CASES
Tenacity and attention to detail.
Neal H. Roth, Lawyer has been representing the legal interests of clients in the GTA (Greater Toronto Area) since 1982. In his three decades of service, he has assisted both individuals and small to medium-sized businesses in achieving their goals in court. He has become known for his ethical dealings with clients and aggressive stance in court when defending clients’ rights.
Preparation is everything.
The number one compliment that Neal H. Roth receives from judges is how well-prepared he is when trying a case. He will look at an issue from all angles and make sure that he has a response for anything the opposing counsel brings up. When you retain Mr. Roth’s services, you’ll find that he leaves no stone unturned in his thoroughness, poring over every detail of the case until he knows it inside and out and is able to find and point out inconsistencies that can sway a case in your favor.
Setting the bar high.
Neal has acted as counsel in many cases. A few of the more significant and landmark cases are:
Hobson v. Turner, 2022 ONSC 4062.
Thermal Exchange Service Inc. v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1289, 2022 ONCA 186.
Beals v. Saldanha, [2003] S.C.J. No. 77.
Heritage Masonry Ltd. v. Building Team Ltd. (1995), 28 C.L.R. (2d) 101 (Gen. Div.), affirmed May 27, 1996 Divisional Court.
Van Arnhem v. Lornewood Tanning Salon Inc., [1993] O.J. No. 2858, 11 C.L.R. (2d) 54.
Webster v Decorceiling [1993] O.J. No. 1453.
Practical application of the law.
Whether you are a plaintiff or a defendant, when you meet with Neal H. Roth, you will find him to be a forthright counselor, speaking truth regarding your case that you need to hear. Using his experience and vast and intimate knowledge of the Ontario court system, he will assist you in setting realistic goals and forming strategies with which to attain them.
bottom of page